Archive - Gage RSS Feed

Maria Callas “biopic” in the works

Callas and Ghiringhelli at the Milan premiere of “La dolce vita.”

Callas and Ghiringhelli at the Milan premiere of “La dolce vita.”

From two sources (Screen International and the website of De Angelis Group) comes the news that Niki Caro is to direct an English-language biographical film about Maria Callas based on the “novel” by Alfonso Signorini, Troppo fiera, troppo fragile.

Apparently without irony, the De Angelis site identifies Signorini, the editor of the tabloid Chi, as a “profound connoisseur of local and international gossip (or gossips).”

Andrea Zoso of De Angelis states, “the source material provided by Mr. Signorini’s book is the most in-depth to date about the life of the controversial opera star.”

Does Mr. Zoso mean depths of idiocy? depths of shamelessness?

I wrote about the “novel” earlier.

The photo shows Maria Callas at the Milan premiere of Fellini’s La dolce vita in February 1960. According to Nicholas Gage, whose theory of a “secret son” Signorini more or less adopts as his own, Callas was in her seventh month of pregnancy when this photo was taken—at a time when adultery was a crime in Italy.

Maria Callas in Werther

A reader of this blog kindly sent me excerpts from an interview with the Paris-based coach and voice teacher Janine Reiss, who worked with Maria Callas from the early 1960s until just before her death.

So many people are deeply invested in the idea that Maria Callas was adrift, suicidally depressed, and simply waiting for death at the end of her life. Even Nicholas Gage, who has perpetuated other myths about Callas, dismisses this idea. He quotes a friend of Callas who spoke to her in September 1977: “Of course it was a long time ago… but I can tell you that all the reports that she killed herself are totally wrong. She was very upbeat, full of plans, and really pleased with herself that she had lost weight.”

Stelios Galatopoulos discounted the notion that Callas was desolate and isolated, too, and wrote that Callas had plans to record Werther. The Reiss interview sent by the kind reader confirms this. Reiss was about to leave for New York:

The last day I saw her was 15 September 1977. I went to her house. She accompanied me to the door and said to me on the threshold, “Janine, come back soon, because it’s very hard to have a singing teacher who abandons you to go travelling. I want to work only with you. Will you come back soon? If so, when?” She was obviously anxious, upset, to see me leaving her for a whole month. “Listen, Maria, I’m not going away for a year but for one short month. As you know, I’ll be in New York, where you were born, and you’ll always know where to reach me.” When she kissed me, Maria said: “Come back soon, because when you return, I really want us to get down to work on Charlotte in Werther, which I want to record.”

Callas said that she felt spiritually close to Massenet’s dutiful Charlotte, and she recorded the “Air des lettres” in the early 1960s, sang it during her “comeback” tour, taught it at Juilliard, and also sang it in concert in June 1963, the performance I offer you today.

Maria Callas, thirty-four years on

Note: I first published this tribute to Callas in September 2007 at my old blog, vilaine fille, to mark the thirtieth anniversary of Callas’s death. Many bloggers kindly linked to it, and ionarts at the time wrote: “Best Maria Callas tribute. Anywhere.” It is slightly revised here.

Maria Callas as Anna Bolena

Maria Callas as Anna Bolena.

The densely encrusted tiaras and parures threw off icy flashes of color—acid yellow, violet, snowy white. Spectral women hovered silently in front of the jewels. There was a will-o’-the-wisp ballerina wearing a crown of dainty white flowers; a somber queen whose huge eyes were dark with encroaching madness; a pagan priestess lost in thought, swept up in the riptide of her doom.

The gems were fakes: Swarovski crystals, the same kind that sparkle on the Metropolitan Opera’s chandeliers. And the ghostly ladies were holograms of soprano Maria Callas, on display earlier this year along with her stage jewelry and other memorabilia in the Met’s Founders Hall.

At New York’s P.S. 189 in 1937.

At New York’s P.S. 189 in 1937.

The installation of Callas relics blotted out the portraits of Met stalwarts that line the space. That was not the least of the exhibit’s ironies, given that the New York-born soprano’s appearances with her hometown company were infrequent (twenty-one in all), mediocre (Callas was never on top form in New York and also groused of “lousy” productions and mix-and-match casts), and abruptly interrupted when Met intendant Rudolf Bing dismissed her in 1958. Callas lived in New York from her birth in 1923 until 1937, and again from 1945 to 1947. All her life, when she let slip her grand airs, she spoke English with a decided New York snap.

The world’s most celebrated soprano died in Paris, rich, silent, and young, thirty years ago, on September 16, 1977. A frenzy of memorializing is now under way. By the company’s estimate, more than three million people have viewed the Swarovski-sponsored jewels show, most recently seen in Japan—where, as it happens, Callas last sang in public: November 1974, Sapporo, the terminus of her dismal “comeback” tour. A thirtieth anniversary exhibit opens this week at La Scala, with film screenings and displays of costumes and photos. 2007 has been the official Year of Maria Callas in Greece, her ancestral land, where an admirer stole one of her dresses from the Italian Cultural Institute in Athens, then mailed it back. In 2000, Callas-worship took perhaps its most morbid turn, as some 500 lots of her personal effects—including foundation garments and Pyrex measuring cups—were auctioned off amidst mayhem in Paris. Items from her ex-husband’s estate are to be sold in Milan later this year.

Catalogue from Milan auction and lot.

Poster and lot from 2007 Milan auction.

Half a century after her greatest triumphs, Callas continues to define popular conceptions of opera. Her image has been used to hawk Apple computers, and her voice has been sampled in pop music—Enigma’s “Callas Went Away,” for example, through which flutter mournful samples of Callas in an aria from Massenet’s Werther. She has been the subject of defamation on Broadway (Terrence McNally’s Master Class) and hagiography at the movies (Franco Zeffirelli’s Callas Forever). Rufus Wainwright’s opera Prima Donna is based in part on Callas’s words and life.

As former Callas bootlegs have been rehabilitated, joining her official EMI catalogue, and as her EMI recordings have begun entering the public domain in Europe, she remains (by some estimates—EMI was unable to confirm this) the best-selling classical singer of all time. Nearly all she set down sounds dim and agèd compared with current-day marvels, but she is a heavyweight even on iTunes, where most, perhaps all, of her EMI recordings can be downloaded, including such ephemera as two test recordings she made in 1953 of “Non mi dir” from Mozart’s Don Giovanni.

Onassis and Callas in 1959.

Onassis and Callas in 1959.

As the decades separating us from Callas stack up, the obsession with the most intimate aspects of her life, material and artistic, grows ever more intense. In Greek Fire, his account of the soprano’s affair with the shipping magnate Aristotle Onassis, Nicholas Gage alleged that, in 1960, Callas insisted that a “secret son” she was carrying be delivered by an elective caesarean in her eighth month of pregnancy, so that Onassis would not see her “swollen and nine months pregnant.” As Gage tells it, the premature infant died as a result of Callas’s vanity. Whether or not his claims hold up (and the evidence against them is overwhelming), they speak to the moralistic fervor to see Callas get her comeuppance that burns even today.

In death as in life, Callas vexes and unnerves. Her voice could be wiry and sour, and her cancellations disruptive, but in hindsight, it seems that where Callas roused the greatest controversy was in testing the limits of tolerance for conspicuous female power. She was the girl who started with nothing and became the most celebrated musician on the planet—the heavy woman who willed herself into an Audrey Hepburn-like sylph—the artist who seemed to be able to sing any music written for the female voice. Fans and biographers claim that Callas wracked her voice when she (a) lost the weight and/or (b) dumped her dull but devoted husband for the rakish Onassis. How dare she? The Milanese public that crowned Callas queen of La Scala also, at the pinnacle of her greatness, smeared the outside of her home with fæces. The chances she took and the heights she reached were simply too much to bear.

Maria Callas in “Poliuto” and Barbie

Maria Callas in “Poliuto” and Barbie.

Callas remains the standard by which other singers are judged. Today, some call the starlet Anna Netrebko “the Russian Callas,” inspired by the dark beauty and hyperkinetic stage manner the two purportedly share. But despite her reputation as a scenery-chewer, Callas was always spare and restrained in her movements. Instead, she burned with music’s inner fire—as shown in video from her 1958 Paris concert, where she is often still and always mesmerizing. And while Netrebko has copped to showing up for engagements with her music unlearned, Callas was ever the diligent schoolgirl. As a teen, she was the first to arrive and the last to depart at her teachers’ studios. As an established star, she sometimes rehearsed for twenty hours at a stretch, studying scores and honing her slow, graceful gestures deep into the night.

Callas at the piano, at home in Milan.

Callas at the piano, at home in Milan.

Of all the Callas treasures from which one can choose—the La Scala Traviata from 1955, the Dallas rehearsal and Cologne Sonnambula from 1957, the EMI Verdi and mad scenes recitals, and the studio sets of Norma—I think that those 1953 test recordings from Don Giovanni may best represent what she was about. Callas sight-read the music (she had not prepared it in advance), so the interpretations lack her customary fire. But listen to the wonders that she was able to summon on the fly: poised, exquisitely tapered phrases, whistle-clean passagework, pinpoint-perfect staccatos, and a trill of instrumental neatness. They were fruits less of “genius” than of self-abnegating devotion to craft.

The performances remind us that, behind the glitter and the ever-shifting guises, there was a woman who served art with humility and love. The awe that Callas inspires today, thirty years after her death, is an echo of the awe that she herself brought to music.

A woman, a voice, a travesty

So-called Aida necklace

The so-called “Aida” necklace

Hello, world! Sorry to have been silent for so long—the vicissitudes of unemployment and technical snafus are behind that—but I’m back, and I hope that you like the new digs.

Something else kept me quiet. In March, I attended the exhibit Maria Callas: A Woman, A Voice, A Myth at the Italian Cultural Institute in New York. The exhibit was a travesty, so slovenly and dishonest that I found it hard to summon the energy to write about it.

Where to begin? Well, the Institute originally announced this exhibit for late 2010. Seeking to learn where and when, I sent e-mails to a half-dozen Institute staff members, asked for information via Facebook and Twitter, and also had colleagues (a prominent journalist and an Italian vice-consul) make inquiries on my behalf. No one at the Institute saw fit to respond to us. (I didn’t phone because I knew from past experience that Institute staff don’t return calls.)

In New York, the Alliance Française, Deutsches Haus, Scandinavia House, Japan Society, and the Czech Centre, to name analogous institutions whose programs I enjoy, represent their respective cultures with honor and professionalism. With so much to offer, why does the Italian Cultural Institute fail to do the same?

But I digress.

The Callas exhibit was organized by Italian Cultural Institute of New York and the Consulate General of Greece in New York in collaboration with the Associazione Culturale Maria Callas, with major support from the Stavros Niarchos Foundation. The curator was Renata Rosati.

The exhibit comprised about a dozen placards, one room of gowns and costumes, another of stage jewels, around two dozen large-scale photos (all familiar images), and a video presentation.

A few of my criticisms:

  • The wall texts were illiterate, translated by someone only fleetingly acquainted with English syntax, grammar, and nomenclature. As we locals say, this is New York F*cking City. How hard is it to scare up a native speaker of English to translate wall texts? Had someone asked me, I would gladly have translated them for free, and I know that I am not alone.
  • Not to belabor the point, but this is New York F*cking City and Maria Callas was born here. No other city in the world can make this claim, yet the exhibit scarcely acknowledged or examined this fact. Traveling shows have inherent limitations, to be sure, but the exhibit needed to be tweaked and expanded for its visit to Maria Callas’s hometown.
  • Some of the material in the exhibit was suspect. Our friend “Nina Foresti” has written at length about the more dubious costumes. For my part, I would note that the necklace shown in this post was labelled “Aida 1965,” though Callas last sang Aida on stage in 1953. It was one of a number of objects bearing fanciful labels that, to the best of my knowledge, have no documented connection to Callas.
  • The exhibit included a continuous loop of the 2004 BBC documentary, Maria Callas: Living and Dying for Art and Love, which features, for no reason that I can discern, Dame Judi Dench holding forth on Callas, as well as Nicholas Gage peddling his questionable tale of Callas’s dead baby.
  • The exhibit was open weekdays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. In other words, I was able to see it only because I am unemployed. Working stiffs were out of luck. Does that seem fair to you?